THE HOME OF
Duke of Cambridge #Helmet Source: Appeared in photo, eyewitness accounts listed in Bulge Report and detailed in William & Harry: A Portrait of Two Princes by Ingrid Seward
61 Comments
hmm
31/7/2016 06:58:45 pm
hes actually uncut. the pics prove that. his brother is to
Reply
THUK
9/8/2016 07:26:14 am
We've seen pictures to the contrary, but if you have evidence, please share with us and we'll revise the listing.
Reply
Robert Drury
20/12/2022 06:36:11 am
I would suck his cock
Its complicated
7/11/2017 12:49:23 pm
The photos prove nothing. You can see his glans but he is also holding his penis in a quite strange v-grip. It could be that he is circumcised. It might equally be that he is holding his foreskin back. The photos are completely inconclusive.
Reply
Mike
6/4/2019 05:15:14 pm
What photos are you talking about?
Reply
Dr. Gennaro Giammarino, III
22/2/2020 10:33:20 am
Neither William or Harry are circumcised. I've been in the showers with
Reply
Kenneth
10/1/2023 10:50:29 pm
This is completely false, as confirmed in Prince Harry’s book “Spare”. Both William and Harry are confirmed as being circumcised.
Brad walton
30/5/2021 12:21:46 am
What pix? The royal biographer (Ingrid Seward) said he was circumcised.
Reply
Luc
5/6/2022 06:45:39 pm
You are correct and so was she. William and Harry are circumcised as most aristocrats happen to be.
hes uncut
19/11/2016 06:15:54 pm
hes pulling his foreskin back in those pics.
Reply
Dr. Gennaro Giammarino, III
5/3/2021 07:03:24 pm
You're 100% correct. i was in the showers with both William & Harry many times after sports and at school. neither is circumcised.
Reply
Vicky
7/1/2023 10:22:02 am
Wrong. You are a liar. Prince Harry has confirmed in his book that he was circumcised as a baby.
THUK
22/11/2016 04:26:03 pm
We've not seen any pictures showing a royal foreskin. If you have any please let us know. We have however, seen pictures that support reports that Prince William and Harry are in Team Helmet like their father.
Reply
walt frazier
7/3/2018 04:58:20 am
What is in team hrlmet
Reply
James
26/7/2017 04:39:14 pm
Both William and harry it is revealed in a biography the their mother although against it did relent on this and they were both circumcised at birth
Reply
Dr. G. Giammarino, III
5/9/2017 12:59:48 am
They're Uncircumcised. Neither were circumcised even as teens.
Reply
Walt Frazer
7/3/2018 05:00:43 am
UnCUT THAT WAY TO GO. ESPECIALLY CONE IN CONTACT WITH FEMALES WHO PREFER CUT PENISES U HAVE THE ADVANTAGE IF UN CUT. YOU CAN ROLL BACKBONE TIME 😄👍
Reply
TradWarrior
21/2/2020 09:44:10 pm
Uncut is not the 'way to go'.
Dr. Gennaro Giammarino, III
5/3/2021 07:10:06 pm
Women in Europe could care less if you're cut. Most don't care in Europe. I'm in the States now and I found no problems with being Uncut. My wife likes me Uncut and hasn't slept with Cut men. Most women are fascinated. Anyway, the United States is really weird with Cut or Uncut. Everywhere else they don't care.
Vicky
7/1/2023 10:23:24 am
Wrong. Harry confirmed he’s circumcised in his book. Why do you make stuff up? Attention seeker
Reply
Marty
16/2/2018 07:15:30 am
I heard that Princess Diana only had her way for a short while and once she & Prince Charles split up, Prince Charles then had the 2 boys circumcised on the "quiet" under the stealth code-name=Hernia Operation. There are some photos (alleged to have taken by the late Sir Jimmy Savile-a well-known pervert & accused pedophile & close associate of Prince Charles)showing Prince William naked at the beach & in the soccer change rooms with a distinct creamy colored helmet-I have no idea if these photographs were authentic or not, but they looked real enough to the naked eye.
Reply
James
24/7/2018 05:10:18 pm
Do you have a source for this information?
Reply
Nick
2/12/2023 05:55:28 am
Where can we find these pictures
Reply
Barry
23/4/2018 02:10:05 pm
It was reported that after Diana's death William was circumcised to appease the Royal family who have had the tradition since George 1. It was reported that Harry refused and is still uncut.
Reply
Michael Stenz
21/6/2018 10:25:13 pm
the practice started earlier, In 1441 Pope Eugene the 4th proclaimed that Catholic's born to the religion should not be cut, as the bible states God created man in His image, King Henry the 8th, broke from the church and created the Church of England, for fear of a Catholic sitting on the throne after his death he wrote into law, that any future king must be cut. When the Tutor family died out, the British Establishment went to the Prussian Houses to find their new king, they choose from a family that had two branches of religion, one Catholic, and the other Jewish.
Reply
Julian
16/2/2020 01:08:44 am
Wherever are you getting your history? Pope Eugene IV issued a Bull in respect of circumcision but this was in respect of the putative mutual recognition of the Holy Orders of the See of Rome and the Christian Coptic Churches which had retained the rite. To this day, the Coptic Apostolic and Autocephalous Churches of the East and the See of Rome remain mutually unrecognized and the former regard Roman Catholicism as heterodox. All heirs to the Spanish throne were traditionally circumcised as a result of circumcision's ancient association with royalty. Henry VIII made no such proclamation. When Elizabeth I, the last monarch of the House of Tudor, died without issue, the throne passed to the House of Stuart and James VI of Scotland and I of England. When the last monarch of the House of Stuart, Queen Anne, died without issue, the throne passed over 52 other claimants as a result of the requirement to be Protestant, to George I of the House of Hanover. Hanover is not in Prussia. When the Duke of Kent, the last living son of George III died, his daughter, Alexandrina Victoria, acceded to the British throne, effectively the last monarch of the House of Hanover. She married Prince Albert of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. "Saxe" is the French form of Saxony, which was used as the Almanach de Gotha was written in French and not German. Saxony was not part of Prussia. Victoria and Albert's eldest daughter, also called Victoria, married Prince Frederick William of Prussia and who reigned as German Emperor only briefly owing to his premature death from cancer. That is the only link between the royal house of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha - later Windsor - and the Prussian House of Hohenzollern. The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha was Lutheran Protestant, not Catholic. There have, however, been persistent rumours that Albert was possibly the illegitimate son of the court's musician who was thought to be Jewish. These rumours started as a result of Albert's very distinct difference in facial features from both his father and brother and because his father had Albert's mother "put away" for repeated adultery. It did not help matters that Albert turned out to be a very highly accomplished and talented musician in his own right. Although persistent, there has been no evidence uncovered as to the veracity of these rumours. There is no evidence at all that any of Victoria's male children were circumcised as there is absolutely no corroborated historical evidence that she subscribed to the somewhat bizarre theories of the British Israelites, a sect which, without any systematic evidence, maintained that the British royal house was ultimately descended from one or several of the lost tribes of Israel. This falsehood is repeatedly used as spurious evidence that the British royal family adopted circumcision. There is no evidence that George III was circumcised. Circumcision in the British royal family only started with (possibly) the sons of George V - the two eldest of whom, David and Bertie, would both reign as Edward VIII and George VI - after routine infant circumcision had been promoted in late Victorian times as a prophylactic measure, with most of the British upper classes briefly adopting it. Prince Charles was circumcised by a Dr Snow, a Jewish mohel, at the request of the present Queen and his father, the Duke of Edinburgh. As Charles was in direct line to the throne, an announcement, in royal tradition, was posted on the gates of Buckingham Palace to that effect. Her other sons were also circumcised at birth. As there is no evidence at all as to the status of any previous generations of the royal family being in fact circumcised, it is entirely possible that Prince Charles was the first member of the family to be circumcised owing to the direct influence of his father.
Reply
TradWarrior
21/2/2020 09:54:08 pm
@Julian
Fred Woodworth
30/7/2021 09:23:44 pm
And God decreed on the eighth day all Jewish children to be circumcised..Why the eighth day? There is nothing magical about Jewish children. Any doctor in any country will confirm that a child's body is strongest against infection on the eight day, thereafter it wanes ever so slightly. Circumcised as an adult due to an infection on the glans, but I feel more of a man because of it.
Reply
Trevor H.
13/7/2022 07:11:07 am
You say you feel more of a man because your foreskin was removed? Well, let's admit that's entirely in your head. I'm glad you adjusted to your op, but I have treated many cases of balano-posthitis, (inflammation of the glans and the undersurface of the foreskin) and a circ is not generally needed unless very marked phimosis (non-retractile foreskin due to tightness) is evident. There are some indications for circumcision medically, but mostly, tightness of the foreskin can be resolved by 1. ongoing masturbation 2, preputial stretching procedure 3. steroid cream to thin the skin and increase flexibility. NOTE: a modified circ, involving only the very tip of the foreskin, is also an option for phimosis. In fact, the original biblical circs were just that. The high-n-tight kind are often very destructive of nervous tissue. Research indicates circumcision defo reduces the sensitivity of the glans. I am pretty sure most boys who haven't been circ'd by their teens would not want to lose their wizard's sleeve for obvious reasons. It intrigues me that modern people rationalise a practice initially due to stone age superstition, one of a large number of weird genital mutilations humans have practiced over many millennia.
Trevor H.
13/7/2022 07:21:35 am
Your presumption that their is a "God" is the weakness in this argument, as their is not a shred of evidence for such a being, and if there were, the idea that in a universe of c. 2 trillion galaxies "he" would obsess about removing part of the body he designed to function perfectly, is incomprehensible. It's often done, I can vouch, in a very amateurish and damaging way (some surgeons specialise in trying to fix botched circs) and I have seen ghastly examples of the blunders.
Benton James
9/4/2019 02:46:45 pm
Harry and Wiiliam are both uncurcumcised. I know them personally and have been in locker rooms with them nude after a match. They both are not circumcised.
Reply
Kenneth
11/1/2023 08:36:52 pm
The revelations in Harry’s book show that what you have claimed is complete untrue.
Reply
Dr. G. Marino
6/5/2019 03:38:04 pm
Okay, I know them and have been with them in the same locker room showers with them. They're Uncut and never changed their status as far as I know, because as of 2017, the last time we showered after a sporting event, both were still Uncut. Queen Victoria started Circumcision because she believed she was descended from King David of Israel, not Henty VIII. Princes George and Louis aren't Cut either.
Reply
Satan
24/9/2019 05:23:52 am
i hope they are cut....DOG dicks are Disgusting....i hope all uncut fuckers...get infected and have theiur dicks cut off......Ba ha ha h a....jk
Reply
TradWarrior
18/1/2020 11:20:34 pm
It is if course entirely possible that neither Dr G Marino and Benton James above actually know the Princes as they claim, and that they are merely intactivists on here to persuade us that the younger royals are uncut.
Reply
Bobby
10/2/2020 10:37:31 pm
It has been my experience that most englishmen is uncut.
Reply
TradWarrior
13/2/2020 07:00:40 pm
@Bobby
Reply
My word, how you lot twist facts! You will find that English males are usually NOT cut. The percntages found do vary, but I have found that between 8 and 12% of males are cut. The percentage will increase if one looks at certain areasL e.g. Fee paying schools & colleges will have a higher percentage. This is because the mother, incorrectly, thought that her child being 'done' would improve his chances and social standing.
Reply
TradWarrior
2/2/2021 06:53:19 pm
Those mothers you speak of were quite correct. Circumcision gives a much better start in life: it is cleaner, it looks better, and women seem to prefer it. We upper- and middle-class boys can vouch for that!
Reply
16/1/2022 07:17:46 am
Rubbish! Read Mumsnet and see how British women can flame a misguided innocent who asked where she could get her son circumcised.
Gerard Delrez
12/2/2022 11:52:57 pm
@John Foster
TradWarrior
14/2/2022 02:33:56 pm
@Gerard Delrez
Dr. Gennaro Giammarino, III
6/2/2021 12:15:19 pm
His Royal Highness, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge is not circumcised. His mother didn't want it done and her wishes were allowed. I know him personally from school and he is not circumcised nor did he have it done at 21, as many say he had done. There are photos of him urinating in the woods while playing foot ball and you can clearly see him retracting his foreskin to urinate, shake and put his foreskin back in the correct position after he was done.
Reply
TradWarrior
9/2/2021 07:00:02 pm
Dr Giammarino
Reply
Joseph H
27/2/2021 01:25:01 am
I have been on both sides of the circumcision equation having been cut at age 22 and soon after lost 30% of feeling on my member. If nature wanted human boys without foreskins like our pet dogs seem to be, nature would have arranged it so. Both the shape of the glans, along with the foreskin, have a clever reason for existing, at least for our Neanderthal kin. When the penis enters the vaginal tube, the foreskin gets pulled back and the bare head presses against the cervix of the uterus, preventing semen from a previous male from entering the opening. By pushing it to the ends or ledges of the head, it awaits the next penis pull-back, allowing the foreskin to wrap the other guy’s semen sample and deliver it “outside” of the vaginal opening as thrusting continues.
Kenneth
10/1/2023 10:46:22 pm
That’s clearly untrue given Prince Harry’s revelation that he and his brother are both circumcised.
Reply
TradWarrior
5/3/2021 06:36:50 pm
@JosephH
Reply
Adam
2/4/2021 05:32:16 pm
On being invited to Prince Charles' wedding in 2005, Chief Mohell Jacob Levinson said he "was deeply honoured when invited to perform the bris for William and Harry". This was in a press release by the Board of Deputies of British Jews dated April 2005.
Reply
Freddy Redmain
9/8/2022 06:00:27 pm
Not true. There is no such thing as "chief Mohel" and even if there were, he would not make such a ridiculous comment privately, let alone publicly.
Reply
Peter Sampson
24/1/2022 03:40:48 pm
Circumcision is far preferred and better for many reasons- I should know as I was circumcised at 42 yo and have experienced both states. My wife and other women maintain a preference for a circumcised penis as it is so much cleaner and aesthetically pleasing.
Reply
Paul Sutcliffe
26/6/2022 03:21:01 pm
Getting back to the subject, there is a photo of him on Pinterest from his water polo days which is suggestive of him having been circumcised:
Reply
Paul Sutcliffe
9/7/2022 07:17:28 pm
And also this photo if it is genuine:
Reply
Freck
7/1/2023 12:06:06 pm
We now know the truth, from Prince Harry’s book. Charles and Diana chose to have him and William circumcised at birth. So all those on here saying they were at school with them and saw they were uncut in the showers are mistaken. And the “Intacivists” who praised Princess Diana because they thought she had resisted pressure to circumcise were wrong to do so too… just wishful thinking on their part. She was a circ-mum after all 🥰
Reply
Josh
7/1/2023 09:46:14 pm
Prince Harry confirms in his new book that he & Prince William are circumcised:
Reply
Kenneth
10/1/2023 10:56:29 pm
Good that we now know that Princes William and Harry are both definitely circumcised. It would have been surprising if they weren’t; it’s very common in upper class English families and no doubt a very large percentage of boys at Eton would have been circumcised. It’s also now clear that Diana wasn’t anti-circumcision either for hers or for her lovers. Many, perhaps even all, of her lovers were circumcised.
Reply
Kevin D.
4/3/2023 08:03:42 pm
It once was the tradition of the upper classes to have all their male offspring circumcised. It may have been that the lower, poorer classes didn't have their sons cut, because of the costs. Since the formation of the NHS, and cost cutting, circumcisions are quite rare nowadays.
Reply
10/3/2023 02:09:09 am
My parents made the right choice my father was born in England and was circumcised at birth like his parents and brothers so I was circumcised at birth my age that was the common choice and a good one now unless dads circumcised there boys are uncut.a fair few of them when they get older have the operation to circumcise as they have issues with there Willy’s.lot of doctors are against circumcission now but should let parents make that choice personally and let it be done if it’s requested
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
What British men are packing downstairsMore than one in five British men are circumcised (helmets/roundheads), but a lot of our cut brothers have grown up feeling isolated. Categories
All
Archives
November 2023
|